• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
(914) 220-1086

Law Offices of Thomas L. Gallivan, PLLC

Just another WordPress site

  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
      • Daniel F. Gallivan
      • Thomas L. Gallivan
      • James C. Freeman
      • Andrew J. Gilbride
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Car Accident Lawyers
        • Car Accident Lawsuits and Settlements
      • Pedestrian Accident Lawyers
      • Slip & Fall Lawyers
      • Truck Accident Lawyers
      • Wrongful Death Lawyers
      • Motorcycle Accident Lawyers
      • White Plains Uber Accident Lawyers
    • Nursing Home Abuse
      • Bedsores and Pressure Ulcers
      • Brain Bleeds
      • Bruises and Cuts
      • Elopement
      • Falls & Broken Bones
      • Group Home Abuse
      • Infections
      • Malnutrition
      • Medication Errors
      • Physical Abuse
      • Wrongful Death
    • Medical Malpractice
      • Birth Injury
      • Emergency Room Negligence
      • Failure to Diagnose
        • Stroke and Heart Attack
        • Lymphoma
        • Leukemia
        • Cancer
        • Breast Cancer
        • Colon Cancer
        • Prostate Cancer
        • Kidney Cancer
      • Hemiparesis
      • Gastric Bypass Malpractice
      • Medication Errors
      • Meningitis
      • Neurological Injuries
      • Statute of Limitations
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Notable Cases
    • Nursing Home Citation Map
    • Nursing Home Citations
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
      • Daniel F. Gallivan
      • Thomas L. Gallivan
      • James C. Freeman
      • Andrew J. Gilbride
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Car Accident Lawyers
        • Car Accident Lawsuits and Settlements
      • Pedestrian Accident Lawyers
      • Slip & Fall Lawyers
      • Truck Accident Lawyers
      • Wrongful Death Lawyers
      • Motorcycle Accident Lawyers
      • White Plains Uber Accident Lawyers
    • Nursing Home Abuse
      • Bedsores and Pressure Ulcers
      • Brain Bleeds
      • Bruises and Cuts
      • Elopement
      • Falls & Broken Bones
      • Group Home Abuse
      • Infections
      • Malnutrition
      • Medication Errors
      • Physical Abuse
      • Wrongful Death
    • Medical Malpractice
      • Birth Injury
      • Emergency Room Negligence
      • Failure to Diagnose
        • Stroke and Heart Attack
        • Lymphoma
        • Leukemia
        • Cancer
        • Breast Cancer
        • Colon Cancer
        • Prostate Cancer
        • Kidney Cancer
      • Hemiparesis
      • Gastric Bypass Malpractice
      • Medication Errors
      • Meningitis
      • Neurological Injuries
      • Statute of Limitations
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Notable Cases
    • Nursing Home Citation Map
    • Nursing Home Citations
  • Contact Us
Call
Contact
Blog
Home  /  Personal Injury Law  /  Car Accident Victim’s Shoulder Injury Deemed a “Serious Injury” Under the Insurance Law

Car Accident Victim’s Shoulder Injury Deemed a “Serious Injury” Under the Insurance Law

by Law Offices of Thomas L. Gallivan, PLLC 02 Aug2015

The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department modified a trial court order in a car accident case, denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment regarding the “significant” limitation and 90/180-day injury claims.

The plaintiff was involved in a car accident and suffered injuries to his left shoulder. After the accident, the plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit under Insurance Law 5102 (d). The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, requesting that the complaint be dismissed.

Article 51 of the Insurance Law allows plaintiffs to sue the driver-at-fault if either the damages exceed $50,000 or the plaintiff has suffered a “serious injury.” The plaintiff must prove that the other driver was at fault and that the other driver’s negligence caused the injuries.

Insurance Law 5102 (d) defines a serious injury as: (1) death, (2) dismemberment, (3) severe disfigurement, (4) loss of fetus, (5) fracture, (6) permanent loss of use of the body part, (7) permanent consequential limitation of the use of the body part, (8) significant limitation of the use of the body part or (9) non-permanent impairment of the use of the body part that prevents the plaintiff (in at least 90 days during the 180 days following the accident) from performing his or her daily activities.

In his motion for summary judgment, the defendant argued that the plaintiff had failed to show a “permanent consequential” or “significant limitation” or a 90/180-day injury as required by Insurance Law 5102 (d).

As part of discovery, the defendant’s orthopedist expert examined the patient. The defense expert found a full range of motion and concluded there were no issues with the shoulder. The orthopedist also opined there was evidence of a pre-existing left shoulder injury that could have caused the issues, not the car accident. The orthopedist found evidence that a minor contusion was the result of the crash but believed the more serious injuries were due to the pre-existing injury. In addition, the defendant’s radiologist expert conducted an MRI and found that the shoulder appeared normal.

Based on this expert testimony, the defendant argued that no permanent consequential or significant limitation of the left shoulder existed. The plaintiff opposed and submitted medical reports by his treating orthopedist. According to the reports, the orthopedist saw only a minor limitation in June 2010, the plaintiff then ceased treatment for almost 1.5 years, and then the orthopedist saw significant injury in September 2011. Because of this, the First Department held the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in his opposition. There appeared to be no permanent consequential limitation and thus that claim was dismissed.

However, there was evidence of a “significant limitation.” The car accident may have aggravated his pre-existing condition and caused a significant limitation. In January 2010, right after the accident, the orthopedist found significant limitation. The orthopedist stated in the medical history that he believed the car accident caused the injury and ordered physical therapy, which helped. The plaintiff also submitted an MRI report that was taken following the accident that showed a tear caused by the accident that exacerbated his pre-existing condition. The First Department held the plaintiff had at least raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the accident aggravated his shoulder injury and caused significant limitation.

Finally, the defendant argued that the plaintiff did not suffer a 90/180-day injury. The defendant established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by showing that the car accident did not cause a new injury. However, in response, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he was impaired by an injury for at least 90 days following the accident. Plaintiff missed four months of work. He testified that his daily activities like cooking and cleaning were severely hampered. In addition, the medical reports showed he wasn’t medically cleared to work until six months after the accident. As such, summary judgment was not proper on the 90/180-day issue.

If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto accident, you may have a negligence case. Call the personal injury lawyers at the Law Offices of Thomas L. Gallivan, PLLC today to discuss your potential claims.

Sutliff v. Qadar, 122 AD3d 452 (1st Dept., Nov. 13, 2014).

Posted in: Personal Injury Law, Bodily Injury, Motor Vehicle Accidents

Primary Sidebar

Get In Touch

Practice Areas

Personal Injury

  • Wrongful Death
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents
  • Trucking Accidents
  • Pedestrian Accidents
  • Construction Accidents
  • Scaffolding Accidents
  • Slip, Trip & Falls (Premises Liability)
  • Negligent Supervision at a School or Day Care
  • Sidewalk Falls
  • Elevator Accidents
  • Train and Subway Accidents

Nursing Home Neglect & Abuse

  • Bedsores (Pressure Ulcers)
  • Falls & Fractures
  • Malnutrition and Dehydration
  • Physical and Sexual Abuse
  • Wandering & Elopement
  • Unexplained Bruises and Cuts
  • Infection
  • Choking Incidents
  • Medication Errors
  • Group Homes
  • Assisted Living Facilities

Criminal/DWI Defense

  • DWI (Driving While Intoxicated)
  • Criminal Defense
  • Traffic Violations
  • DMV Refusal Hearings
  • Sex Crimes
  • Shoplifting & Larceny
  • Assault & Vehicular Assault
  • Drug Possession
  • Drug Sales
  • Weapons Charges
  • Domestic Violence
  • How is a DWI Defined in New York?
  • Is the Driver’s License Confiscated Immediately Upon a DWI Arrest?

Medical Malpractice

  • Failure to Diagnose Cancer
  • Birth Injuries (Gynecological, Obstetrical)
  • Medication Errors
  • Surgical Errors
  • Gastric Bypass Surgery Errors
  • Emergency Room Errors
  • Failure to Diagnose Heart Attack or Stroke
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Erbs Palsy Birth Injury

Trusts + Estates

  • Wills & Trusts
  • Divorce, Child Support, Custody Issues
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Guardianships
  • Medicaid-Planning
  • Power of Attorney / Health Care Proxy
  • Probate and Estate Administration
  • Surrogate Court Litigation
  • Real Estate
  • Business Formation
  • Wills
  • Will Contests

View All Practice Areas

View All Blogs

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

" Last year I was injured in an accident, and for the first time, needed the advice of an attorney regarding how to proceed. I was referred to Thomas Gallivan through a family member who is a lawyer in Massachusetts. I am beyond pleased with how Thomas handled my case. He was knowledgeable, professional, and although the case was not as straightforward as some, he used every resource to ensure a positive outcome. Thomas communicated with me regularly and I felt completely informed and confident in his ability. He expertly negotiated a fair settlement that I was very happy with. The entire experience was extremely positive, during a stressful time for me. Thank you Thomas. "

Melanie

" Attorney Thomas Gallivan is a wonderful attorney!! I particularly liked his professionalism, consistency, always kept us updated on the case, and available upon request. He worked extremely hard and was persistent on getting the best settlement in a timely matter. I truly appreciated his prompt responsiveness to emails and phone calls. The office staff was very pleasant and made sure to get messages to him asap. Glad we chose this law firm, would highly recommend and in the event that we ever need an attorney again, Gallivan & Gallivan would be my primary choice. "

Katherine R.

" I was a passenger on a motorcycle and ended up falling off the back of the bike due to the driver acting like an idiot. I fell off at a high rate of speed and was very banged up. Fractured wrist and road rash down my back and elbows. I am lucky I didnt die. Not knowing what to do I contacted Thomas and he could not have been anymore helpful!! He went out of his way to meet with me. He actually came to my house for the initial consultation. I know nothing about law or what my options even were. He took me through everything step by step. "

Colin W.

View All Testimonials

245 Main St Suite 450 White Plains, NY 10601

Phone:
(914) 220-1086

Fax:
(516) 394-4229

555 5th Ave 14th Floor
New York, NY 10017

Toll Free:
(855) 228-7369

(By Appointment Only)

1370 RXR Plaza
Uniondale, NY 11556

Phone:
(914) 594-6820

Fax:
(516) 394-4229

12 1st St
Riverhead, NY 11901

Phone:
(914) 825-5855

Fax:
(516) 394-4229

Footer

  • Personal Injury
  • Nursing Home Abuse
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Car Accidents

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

Copyright © 2022, Law Offices of Thomas L. Gallivan, PLLC | Sitemap